Little places

Either as an endorsement for my unhesitance in telling my supervisors when they do things which are dumb, or as punishment for the same, I was recently nominated to be on a committee to make recommendations for improving employee recruitment and retention.  It’s been an enlightening experience, in that many of the obvious issues are structural; until society moves to alter how insurance the state governments pay for it, children’s mental health (in the public sector) will never pay well.  One of the themes my colleagues and I keep coming back to is just how lovely a place we all live.

None of the mountain ranges which surround Helena are especially high, steep, or from afar imposing.  None of them enjoy much renown, even amongst locals.  Indeed, I’d guess that 9 of 10 in a sidewalk survey would struggle to name more than 2 of the 6-8 distinct ranges within a hours drive.  It’s a chicken or egg question as to whether this anonymity is a result of or the cause of the many faint trails and small, uncrowded trailheads which surround us.  In either case, I’ve never lived in a place where so many interesting places met the ultimate modern criteria, having nothing of substance in evidence about them on the internet.  The scope of possibility for my favorite kind of exploration, that where both literal and epistemic footprints are absent, grows with every outing.


There is a massive paradox at the core of last weeks post, which I saved for a separate time and place.  The contradiction, and the question it poses, are that important, and easily in evidence in the Prickly Pear Valley.

In the internet age, nothing is as effective a preservative as anonymity.  Most folks will ignore the evidence in daily view 30 miles away, and allow the weight of conventional wisdom to keep a place with “no hikes worth mentioning” truly wild.  Wild in the sense of having trails with disappear utterly crossing meadows, having signs whose letters are all but weathered back into the wood grain, where animals just do expect to see humans.  To whit, the three black bears (in two separate incidents) I thoroughly scared when they finally saw me, and the mule deer which kept snorting and circling to ascertain just what I was.

I’ve become quite convinced of this strategy, and as of late been here mostly content to drop very vague hints and let people find places the honest way, by looking at a map and wondering what might be right there.  But there are shortcomings to this approach.  One is when traffic gains momentum organically, and the opportunity to steer norms of behavior are lost.  This is what prompted me to publish the Crown Packrafting Guide last year, and what has me worried about the hush-hush nature of mountain biking in many of the local enclaves.  When Forest Service travel plans come due for revision every quarter century, it might be too late to bring a place out of the shadows, and absent a constituency anonymity may change irrevocably before many even know what was there.  A place is logged, a mine goes in and changes drainage patterns, or trails get closed.


Many folks would say the same about closing roads to trucks and ATVs in the same areas, and under current use patterns they’d probably be right.  More miles in big western wildernesses over the years have given me an ever more complicated and conflicted idea of what wildness means, functionally.  Places like the Thorofare, supposedly furthest from roads in the lower 48, gets more visitation in three months across the transition from summer to autumn as many dead end logging roads in the Yaak and Idaho panhandle get in a decade.  Supposedly roadless places like the Salmon River and Grand Canyons get hammered along the river corridor, but these impacts seem to be more substantive aesthetically than ecologically.

There are still places which can mostly be hidden from human knowledge, even in a world with satellite photographs on demand.  But that seems to come with a political cost, potential, perhaps inevitable.


My ordinary task, in getting to know new places, would be to pick good routes and good opportunities, to best crystallize those first memories, which will in their outlines never be surpassed.  Beyond that, a mental map builds outwards, following ease across the land before knitting gaps together with the dusty threads of experience.  Now the haze of potential, both within and beyond my life, crowds all of that.  It’s a proper transformation for a place where I intend to spend decades, but as ever the shape of responsibility is intimidating.

6 responses to “Little places”

  1. Sounds like you’ve found a place that fits you and your needs/wants well. As I consider my future, and ideal places I would like to live, I often wonder what is ideal. I am not a fan of people, but I would be lying if I pretended I wasn’t dependent on most modern conveniences. Adding on top of that the task of finding a place not too ideologically opposite of my own values increases the complexity.

    On a somewhat related not, almost all the national parks I follow on IG are making note of how crowded they are, of how many visitors they receive. On the one hand, I am glad to see people going outside, in some ways leaving behind a culture of consumerism (a hard statement to make given my own propensity for buying gear), but on the other it’s not a fun thought to imagine sharing that natural beauty with hordes of people. When I think about applying for the permit to hike up half dome, it is a very bittersweet thing.

  2. “until society moves to alter how insurance the state governments pay for”

    Dear Mr. Bedrock,

    Society did move to alter insurance. It was called Obamacare. As you might recall, the T Rumps hammered it mercilessly (“It will END the United States as we know it!”) Lately it appears other factors will END us. Nonetheless I want to mention that no outside force will ever make our lives better. Humans are born to suffer, and once we accept this fact, the better off we will all be. The best we all can do is live in a place we can call home. For you it’s Helena, for me it’s the Upper Peninsula. In that regard, a couple of ideas have developed through decades of experience: build a small house with your own hands and develop outdoor areas as part of your living space; be self sufficient in terms of food supplies, like a growing and canning your own food, or perhaps learning that armed-hiking adventures can produce dead-animal protein–this is about as good as it gets on this planet; and dedicate time to growing a friend or two on a local vine. These are the things that will sustain you; never will a government program make your life better. (I typically never say never, but in this case I think usage is appropriate.) Anyway, get on with it. Time is a wastin’.

    1. Thanks for checking in Bill, hope the skeeters aren’t carrying the small dogs off this summer.

      I don’t sit around waiting for the feds to magically trickle things down and fatten my wallet. But pretending that policy changes wouldn’t do handy things like altering the number and caliber of people who chose professions like mine, or public school teachers, is avoidant at best. Playing a good hand isn’t the same thing as pointing out improvements were the game itself changed.

  3. Have you been to the Bob Marshall Wilderness, very few people had been until they designated it “Wilderness” now it’s not so much a wilderness experience. An old timer told me there was virtually no traffic on the road by his dude ranch until it was designated. Now it’s steady traffic as long as the snow is gone. I went a few years back and was dismayed at the trampled trails, camping spots that smelled like an out house on a hot day, trash and the number of people we encountered. I almost felt guilty adding to the problem. Doubt I’ll return I will find me one of those places no one knows about. There are still plenty of those.

    1. Thanks for reading Patty. Dig a bit and you’ll see that I know a bit about the Bob. Pretty easy to avoid the people in all seasons. I’d be glad to give you a few ideas if desired.

      I have no doubt the Bob has become more popular since 1968 (or 1931, when the core was designated as a primitive area). Then again, rangers in the teens reported doing 100+ mile patrol rides and not seeing any critters save grouse, so the notion that it wasn’t impacted in some senses back then strikes me as a bit ahistorical.

      1. Thanks for your reply to my ranting, would love to return unfortunately I have MS and it’s progressed to the point that I can barely walk nor can I get on a horse, my travels will be threw reading blogs.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s