Surly actually has an interesting post up, of note because the artfully marketed slackers have been suffering from their typical post-interbike lull more thoroughly than usual. Their post concerns the 2008 Lovely Ladies on Beautiful Bikes Calender, of which I’d never heard.
This is a familiar rant, and thus I’m resisting the temptation to go into extensive detail. My point is merely this: the ladies pictured, and more significantly the way in which they’re depicted, is very different than any calender-worthy portrayal of male cyclists I can imagine. They’re cute, semi-delicate, semi-tough flowers, not “I ride 20 hours a week and will rip your quads off” bike goddesses.
For example, the bulk of Miss January’s profile:
Bikes:
Bianchi Axis, Kona Jake the Snake, Rocky Mountain Stratos
![]()
Favorite Ride:
Ring Road, Iceland
![]()
Likes:
Riding in falling snow, hot cocoa, curling up on cozy winter
afternoons, snow cats, la nina
![]()
Dislikes:
haters, sharrows, 17mph headwinds
Is there any way for me to take this apart without being sexist and elitist? Unlikely. I’ll just point out that her favorite ride is a huge road tour in a far-off country near the Arctic circle, and we are encouraged to dwell on her wearing a sweater and sitting on our (your, the man’s) couch wrapped in a blanket, rather than riding away from you into the aforementioned 17 mph headwind on mile 80 of a century day.
Do any of these ladies have sexy cycling legs? I couldn’t tell you, they’re hidden under vintage lingerie.
Boooo.
Leave a reply to Meredith Cancel reply