3 responses to “”
-
Feelin’ warm and fuzzy or a bit anxious that the attack dogs are going to be set loose? Myself, I’m going to have a nip of Kentucky’s finest and go to sleep with a smile!
-
Twas interesting news to say the least.The obvious is that voters want change. The difference between the parties is that the D’s have candidates who represent change (or at least optimism in the case of Hil) – Obama being the most identifiable progressive candidate. The R’s have no such candidate – all of them have latched onto Bushes war policies – and they were left with general apathy – and only the evangelical vote showed up in numbers.Look at this NYT column a few days before the Iowa results;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/31/opinion/31mon1.html?ref=opinion
-
What is to me most significant is that everyone was talking about change yesterday. Obama is controlling the conversation, dictating the question to which they must all, for the moment, respond.
Leave a reply to Blair Cancel reply