La Sportiva Trango TRK review

When you go hunting, particularly hunting in the snow, you need boots.  The wet feet aren’t necessarily problematic, but wet feet mean cold feet when you stop to glass.  Hunting also, generally, takes you off the trail and across ridges and sidehills while carrying a heavy pack.  Most people want more shoe or boot in either of these circumstances, to say nothing of both combined, but how much, and why?

When I drew my sheep tag last year I had short notice, and the snow fell early in the season.  I needed waterproof boots, in a hurry, and was lucky that a local shoe had the La Sportiva Trango TRKs.  I have a Sportiva foot; narrow (AA width), low volume, and an even narrower heel.   They’ve messed with the lasts on their trail runners a lot in recent years, trying a more inclusive approach that often leaves me out, but the Trango TRKs fit me perfectly out of the box, something which has thankfully not changed in the past year.  I can wear them with thin socks, and medium weight ones as needed, all with plenty of toe room, but a precise feel.  Putting big miles on them packing out an elk earlier this season, with no foot problems at all, was the ultimate proof.  I have a few niggling complaints, but overall they’ve been darn close to my ideal hunting boot.

It is by far the boot I’ve liked the most, of any I’ve owned.


The TRKs are a low and light (1.5 lbs per shoe in size 45) boot.  The 100% synthetic upper is seamless, with laminated reinforcements, and quite flexible.  It is mated to a stiff, burly sole with a full vibram sole.  The boot doesn’t work with newmatic crampons, but is perfectly at home with full-strap rigs.  Mountaineering bones with close to trail runner weight is the selling point, and is not an exaggeration.

La Sportiva does not hesitate to use softer rubber, and the Vibram on the TRKs is excellent.  The tread has plenty of teeth, unlike the more scrambling oriented Boulder X Mid,  I don’t mind the smooth climbing zone along the big toe, but do mind the lack of any center tread blocks in the heel.  That big space in the middle has been responsible for some needlessly slippery moments in mud.  As can be seen, wear has been perfectly acceptable.

The laminated reinforcements, and decent size rand, have been quite effective at deflecting abrasion thus far.  They former are starting to peel in a number of places, raising longer term questions of weatherproofing, which brings me to the only objections I’ve had to the TRKs performance.  Everytime I’ve had them out in protracted wet slop (deep rain soaked snow, snow and creek crossings churned up by horse traffic) they’ve leaked a decent amount through the tops of the toes.  This leakage is truly minor, and not enough (yet) to be a big deal, but is less than ideal.  My hope is that the sole wears out before the leaking becomes more pronounced.

La Sportiva does now have a leather version of the TRK, which I’d probably buy instead, now.  The only footwear I’ve had which has been truly waterproof in the conditions described above has either been fully plastic ski boots, or fully leather hiking or climbing boots with plenty of snoseal baked in.

Screen Shot 2017-12-06 at 6.07.25 PM

So why is the TRK so effective, for hunting in particular?  First, because they’re so light.  Footwear weight matters, a lot.  I’m not sure the old adage of 1 pound of the foot worth 5 on the back is exactly right, but the spirit of the question is correct.  Second, because they have excellent ankle flexibility.  Ankles support in footwear is largely a myth, as a walkable boot and one which substantively adds to ankle rigidity are mutually exclusive.  The TRK laces high enough to lock in the heel, without much more (I actually don’t use the upper pair of lace hooks).  Third, the TRK is stiff where it needs to be, and padded just enough.  Too much cush makes a shoe or boot wobbly, and too little rigidity relative to the load carried (and the strength of the user) strains the muscles too much.  There is a fashion in the hunting world to use step-in compatible boots for just about everything, something I think promulgates if not outright creates weak legs and ankles.  The name of the game is to have enough rigidity for you, but not too much.  The stiffer the sole, the less efficient your stride, and the harder you’ll have to fight against heel lift, blisters and foot problems.

Fourth, and to go full circle, the TRKs fit me perfectly.  A good fit gives your feet just enough room to swell, but not enough to flop around.  Without that, all the other details don’t matter too much.


9 responses to “La Sportiva Trango TRK review”

  1. Since you’re on footwear, out of curiosity, what do you wear on a daily basis? Does the obsession carry over?

    I’ve taken to the Xero shoes hiking boots (I like a very thin sole), but they have their limitations for work, and in wet / puddly conditions.

    1. These are current my daily drivers:

      But in blue. Not zero drop but nice and flexible.

      1. Nice choice. I like those. Summer is easier what with the wide variety of huaraches out there now.

  2. I’ve tried several La Sportiva shoes, but none of their boots yet. I do like the fit of La Sportiva as far as getting your heel locked in and the way they cradle the mid-foot. What caused me to send back (or sell) several pairs of LS shoes was their lack of room in the toe box- several were almost “pointy”. That’s a deal breaker for me.

    I have to say that I think their outsoles are probably the best out there. Typically pretty aggressive with a very sticky compound- other trail shoe/boot manufacturers should pay attention to what they’re doing with their outsoles.

    The one shoe that has worked for me is their Akasha trail runner (two BMO’s and hundreds of running miles), the toe box is roomy enough to work for me, sadly my foot isn’t as locked in as could be. Thicker insole has helped some. I don’t have a wide foot, just need toe room.

    I’ll have to take a peek at your Trango’s next time I’m over.

    As you state- fit really is everything (well almost :))

  3. Ok, so here is the question. I have always avoided goretex in shoes like the plague, but I see I am the minority. So here I am thinking, is it me being stubborn and antiquated or I am, to my own surprise, actually right? lightweight shoes seem to sport the damn thing almost always. I will not go in my quest for light resolable shoes…

    1. In boots, which you’d only want for snowy conditions mostly, I see no harm in it.

  4. […] backpacking.  I’ve already written at length about the Seek Outside Revolution frame and the La Sportiva Trango Trk boots which both worked so well.  My optics setup was unchanged from years past; Meopta Meopro […]

  5. I’m looking for a lightweight uninsulated hunting boot but have the opposite foot shape. I’m not against ordering multiple pairs to try on but am not sure where to start. Any suggestions for brands that would work with normal width but high volume feet?

    1. My foot is very low volume so I can’t give you much advice on that.

Leave a Reply to Camber Rebmac Cancel reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s