The new Sierra Designs High Route tent, which manages condensation via interior air volume and venting, at the expense of vaguely compromised weatherproofing. Photo by Andrew Skurka.
Condensation is a fact of life when camping in the backcountry. Under certain circumstances condensation will occur in any shelter. The art is in mitigating and avoiding condensation, hopefully to the extent that it never becomes a major issue. If condensation is bad, especially for several nights on end, insulation in clothing and sleeping bags can become very damp. Damp insulation does not work well, and with no chance to dry it, the loss of potential warmth could become problematic.
Condensation occurs when water vapor changes to liquid, as the air temperature drops below the dew point. To keep things simple, we’ll allow that condensation is controlled by two factors, the amount of moisture in the air inside and outside the shelter, and the dew point within and outside the shelter. These factors can be altered via campsite and shelter selection.
The most common and obvious way to manage condensation is to reduce the amount of moisture within the shelter. The number one way to do this is via ventilation and shelter volume. As these are the methods applicable to single wall tents, pyramids, and tarps, which are in turn of primary interest to the lighter weight traveler, I’ll discuss them in detail later.
The Sierra Designs Tensegrity, a single wall tent with exceptional ventilation, and thus near ideal condensation control.
Manipulating the dew point is a less obvious, but very effective, way to manage condensation. It is why double walled tents with fabric inner tents are generally the preferred tool for humid, condensation-prone environments. At night infrared radiation, collected from the sun during the day, is given off by the earth. The combination of this and moving air typically results in the outer surface of a tent or tarp being colder than the ambient air temperature. This means that the outer surface of a shelter often goes below the dew point well before the air at large, and is why condensation on a shelter can often be far more severe than on objects in the immediate vicinity, such as vegetation. A double walled tent with a solid fabric inner is an excellent example. The space between the inner and outer holds air in a semi-still state, which creates a modest insulating effect. This in turn significantly reduces the super-cooling of the outer tent surface, which reduces condensation.
The downside of double wall tents is simple: weight. While there are several new double walls whose weight approaches or even goes below 2 pounds, these all have such significant compromises that they hold no interest for me. Fly and floor fabrics with low hydrostatic head, cramped interiors, and all-mesh inners are the most prominent of these. When design and technology allow for some of the benefits of a fully realized double wall in a light package it will be an appropriate object of excitement.
The Seek Outside BT2, a smaller pyramid/tipi which favors weatherproofing over ventilation.
In any shelter the quality and especially quantity of ventilation is with respect to necessity inversely correlated with wind speed. Truly strong wind circulates air through the shelter whether you like it or not, and makes venting less necessary. In the top picture of the BT2 we had a steady 25-30 mph wind coming down valley all night, and even with the BT2 zipped tight and M and I both inside, we had no condensation. Contrast that with the bottom picture, when I slept solo near a creek on a still night with the doors both open a foot at the bottom, and woke to plenty of frost inside. This is what Seek Outside means when they say the BT2 is optimized for alpine conditions; it is one of the most exceptional wind shedders I’ve ever seen, but in the name of weight and simplicity it has only modest ability to vent, especially when rain protection is necessary at the same time. Compromises always.
The Tensegrity 2 person lies at the opposite end of the spectrum. It allows for near 360 degree venting, even during a steady rain. The doors have fabric covers, but the foot and head are always only mesh, making it a cold tent in a strong wind. And the big flat panels catch a lot of wind and move a lot, though with sufficient tension the tent is far more stable than one might think. It has a similar, slightly smaller footprint than the BT2, but much more interior volume and useable headroom. A great option for mild, warmer, humid weather, but not functional on windy autumn ridges.
The new High Route tent, which designer Andrew Skurka brought on our recent trip, is somewhere between the BT2 and Tensegrity. It has a rectangular footprint which is a bit smaller than the Tensegrity 2, and vertical walls which along with two offset trekking pole supports maximizes headroom and interior air space. Like the Tensegrity, the interior room is hard to believe until you’re inside, and impossible to capture in a photograph. Andrew and I are both on the tall side of normal, and had generous room for us and our gear. Thanks to this, and the large vents, we had minimal condensation at the camp pictured above, even though it rained hard for most of the night. On the other hand, the vertical side walls do catch the wind, as we found out at 4am on our first night out. 40 mph wind and grape size hail had it bowing in plenty, but with good stakes in solid tundra we didn’t seem in imminent danger of reverse defenestration.
Realistically, condensation is a far more frequent and pressing problem for most backpackers than wind resistance. Insofar as this is the case, designs like the Tensegrity and High Route have a lot to recommend them. It is easy get preoccupied by worst-case planning, rather than more practical matters. Sierra Designs have set themselves something of an uphill battle here, which is another reason to recommend them, in addition to build quality which exceeds the competition (Big Agnes, Tarptent) by a considerable margin. Mids will always have appeal, and are still the ideal quiver of one, but sometimes they are not the best choice.
Leave a Reply to DaveC Cancel reply